Month: April 2024

Architecting Digital Transformation

I got this books a couple years ago: Architecting the Digital Transformation, edited by Zimmermann, Schmidt, and Jain. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49640-1. It is interesting to find insights on digital transformation at an enterprise scale with emphasis on architecture-driven agility, the evolution of enterprise architecture roles, and the systemic cultural and organisational shifts necessary to support sustainable, adaptive transformation. Digital transformation has emerged as a critical undertaking for large organisations striving to remain competitive amidst rapid technological and societal change. Success at enterprise scale requires more than the adoption of new technologies — it demands a reimagining of business architecture, organisational culture, and governance mechanisms.

This book offers a research-based perspective on navigating this complexity. A key concept introduced is perpetual evolution—a modular and flexible architectural model that enables continuous innovation. Systems are designed so that components can be independently upgraded or replaced, allowing quick integration of new technologies while avoiding the constraints of monolithic infrastructure.

Complementing this architectural agility is the bimodal IT strategy, which combines a stable core system with a more experimental, agile layer. This setup enables organisations to innovate rapidly without compromising operational stability, bridging legacy systems with modern digital initiatives.

A recurring theme is the alignment between agile teams and enterprise architects. These roles have traditionally been at odds—agile valuing speed and adaptability, while architecture focuses on structure and governance. However, case studies in the book show that collaboration between the two improves both solution integrity and delivery speed. Architects are repositioned not as distant planners, but as facilitators embedded within teams.

To reinforce architectural discipline without imposing rigid control, the authors introduce lightweight governance and social incentives. The Architecture Belt, for example, is a gamified ranking system that encourages adherence to architectural principles in a positive, participatory way. This proves especially effective in large-scale agile environments where consistency must coexist with autonomy.

Cultural change is equally vital. Organisations must build digital dexterity—a culture of fast learning, experimentation, and team autonomy. Successful transformation often comes from empowered cross-functional teams that are free to explore, prototype, and iterate. In this paradigm, enterprise architects become active contributors to the digital ecosystem, supporting communities, sharing knowledge, and offering hands-on technical guidance.

The book also examines the shift in Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM). Traditional, centralised models are no longer compatible with agile and DevOps practices. Instead, Agile EAM is iterative, collaborative, and closely integrated with delivery teams, enabling organisations to respond more effectively to technological and market changes.

Finally, the authors present Service-Dominant Design (SDD) as a practical framework for creating digital services through co-creation. Rather than building solutions in isolation, SDD emphasises contextual understanding, stakeholder collaboration, and iterative development—ensuring outcomes that are both technically sound and meaningfully relevant.

In essence, the role of enterprise architecture is being redefined. The most effective digital transformations are those where architects take a hands-on role in shaping platforms, facilitating cross-team collaboration, and ensuring coherence across the digital ecosystem. By embracing both structure and agility, architecture becomes a living framework that evolves in step with the business.

BOD Convo: BRI & Telkom

As a part of Synergy team of Telkom Group, sometimes we are requested to facilitate meetings between or among SOEs. This week we got involved in a meeting between the Vice CEO of BRI (Catur Budi Harto), IT Director of BRI (Arga Mahanana Nugraha), Group Business Development Director of Telkom (Honesti Basyir), and CEO of Admedika (Dwi Sulistiani) as one of the subsidiary of Telkom. BRI & Telkom are two of the greatest SOE in Indonesia with strong roles & commitments to enhance ecosystem-based national economy through transformations in technology and business: BRI as the top bank in Indonesia, and Telkom surely as the top telco in Indonesia.

Streamlining among SOEs business developments is always necessary, including technological aspects. As a commitment, BRI will cease its satellite initiatives and return instead to use Telkom satellites (or other providers in compliance to regulatory and business norms). Alignments in the use of data centres are under consideration too. National economic development programs will be managed in alignment with competencies and business. An establishment of BRI-Pegadaian-PNM holding to grow MSME and ultra-micro economy is a good example for that, as well as other holdings and strategic alliances among SOEs. Doors for cross investment could also be opened, for example in healthcare ecosystem.

© 2025 Kuncoro

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑